Oracle Stock Slides After Project Jupiter Delay Risk Tests $664 Billion Backlog

Oracle shares fell as much as 7.66% intraday after a force majeure notice tied to Project Jupiter raised fresh concerns about the timing and cost of its AI infrastructure expansion. Investors are weighing a record $664 billion backlog against power, financing and execution risks.

Oracle stock came under pressure on Thursday after the company issued a force majeure notice linked to Project Jupiter, a planned $165 billion AI data center campus in New Mexico. The shares dropped to an intraday low of $133.48 before rebounding to around $137.45, leaving the stock down 4.9% on the session.

The selloff matters because it hit a company that has been posting some of the fastest cloud growth in large-cap technology. Oracle’s remaining performance obligations reached $664 billion in its latest quarter, but the market is now focusing on whether that backlog can be converted into revenue on schedule.

The key issue is not near-term demand. It is whether power, permitting and financing delays at a flagship AI campus could slow the timeline for Oracle’s largest future cloud contracts, especially those tied to multi-year AI buildouts.

Key Facts

  • Oracle shares fell as much as 7.66% intraday to $133.48 before recovering part of the decline and trading near $137.45.
  • Oracle reported fiscal first-quarter 2027 revenue of $19.3 billion, up 30%, with cloud infrastructure revenue surging 121% to $7.4 billion.
  • Remaining performance obligations rose to $664 billion, up sharply from a year earlier and among the largest contracted backlogs in enterprise software.
  • Project Jupiter is designed as a 2.45-gigawatt AI data center campus, with a planned launch timeline in 2028.
  • Oracle ended the period with roughly $125 billion in debt and negative free cash flow of $23.7 billion for the prior fiscal year.

Oracle Project Jupiter Delay Risk

Oracle’s notice to the developer of Project Jupiter does not mean the company is abandoning the project. The move appears to be a contractual step intended to preserve Oracle’s rights if the site fails to come online on time. Management has maintained that the campus remains on schedule and that its commitment to New Mexico is unchanged.

Even so, investors interpreted the notice as a warning sign. Large projects typically do not reach this stage unless there is concern about timing, costs or delivery risk. In Oracle’s case, that matters because Project Jupiter is tied to the company’s broader AI infrastructure strategy and to high-profile customer commitments expected to drive future cloud revenue.

The market reaction reflects a growing distinction in Oracle’s story. Demand for capacity looks strong, and recent results reinforced that point. But Oracle’s valuation is increasingly being shaped by how fast it can build, finance and energize the infrastructure needed to fulfill those contracts. That is where Jupiter has become a focal point.

Oracle has the contracts and the demand; what investors are now pricing is the risk that infrastructure bottlenecks delay when that demand turns into cash.

Why power has become the critical bottleneck

The largest operational challenge at Project Jupiter appears to be power. The campus is expected to rely on Bloom Energy fuel cells supplied by natural gas, but that system depends on pipeline infrastructure and regulatory approvals that have taken longer than expected. A delay in the gas pipeline schedule narrows the window for commissioning and testing before the site’s planned 2028 launch.

This is a broader industry problem, not just an Oracle issue. AI data centers can be designed and financed quickly, but access to power often becomes the gating factor. Grid interconnections, fuel supply, land approvals and environmental permits can move much more slowly than demand for GPUs. Oracle’s strategy of using third-party developers and alternative power configurations may speed some projects, but it also adds dependencies that the company does not fully control.

Implications for Investors

For investors, the immediate takeaway is that Oracle’s near-term guidance has not been directly broken by the Jupiter issue. The project is not expected to contribute revenue before 2028, so fiscal 2027 guidance of at least $90 billion in revenue and $8.10 in non-GAAP earnings per share remains the central earnings anchor. The more pressing question is what happens in fiscal 2028 through 2030, when major AI campuses are supposed to begin converting backlog into recognized sales.

That creates a split view on the stock. On one hand, Oracle trades at a relatively modest forward earnings multiple compared with its growth rate, and cloud infrastructure revenue growth of 121% is exceptional for a company of its size. GPU utilization near full capacity and a rapidly expanding AI contract base suggest demand remains robust. On the other hand, the company’s balance sheet is heavily levered, free cash flow has been deeply negative, and any project delay can have an outsized impact when rates remain elevated.

Investors should also watch Oracle’s financing model closely. The company has relied on a mix of debt, equity issuance, project finance and customer prepayments to fund expansion. That approach can accelerate buildout, but it leaves Oracle exposed to tighter credit conditions and to any signs that developers, lenders or anchor customers may need to revise their commitments. If similar delays emerge at other large campuses, the market could apply a steeper discount to Oracle’s backlog despite strong operating momentum.

The next catalysts are likely to come from execution rather than demand. Investors will be watching for updates on New Mexico power infrastructure, additional capacity delivery, backlog conversion and signs that Oracle can improve cash generation even while scaling its AI cloud footprint.

Ultima Markets